I disagree with that pretty strongly - if you have time, go and read the NYTimes link that I posted below.
Their point is that many children don't have that opportunity, since they're already well behind by the time that they start school. And a large part of the difference in school performance can be explained by differences in the students economic background and family life.
This doesn't square with the equal opportunity / everyone's equal that the US seems to be so fond of.
I agree that "equal opportunities" is a myth. People grow up with vast differences in the advantages they've been given.
However, deserving equal things doesn't mean you get equal things. See the fact that people have different amounts of money from each other, and have for thousands of years. We celebrate the ability of individuals to better their life situation as much as possible, and we don't shame rich people for spending money to give their kids a better education than the government can provide.
The US public school system is simply an attempt to give all children in the entire country access to some education. It would be great if it was a gleaming example of delivering quality on a large scale, up to the standard of, say, McDonald's, but alas it is not.
Their point is that many children don't have that opportunity, since they're already well behind by the time that they start school. And a large part of the difference in school performance can be explained by differences in the students economic background and family life.
This doesn't square with the equal opportunity / everyone's equal that the US seems to be so fond of.