Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | AndrewDucker's commentslogin

Why are you assuming that some technology can only be discovered by AGI?

How does that prove anything?

They're claiming that there are patents, but that doesn't mean there are.


Dolby is only the most recent case, Sisvel consorsium actually bills licences per device:

Consumer Display Device: EUR 0.32

Consumer Non-Display Device: EUR 0.11

(source here: https://www.sisvel.com/licensing-programmes/audio-and-video-...)


Sisvel allows you to pay them if you believe their claims, they haven't actually taken anyone not paying to court yet to prove that. The only court cases for VP9/AV1 from Sisvel so far have been their patents being found invalid/irrelevant.

Dolby is somewhat more interesting in that rather than scare tactics, media hype, and attempting to form a pool about it they are actually taking a patent assertion claim to court.


That crowd are just deeply concerned one of their lucrative revenue streams is disappearing.

So they seem to be attempting to pull a fast one and use unproven claims to try and convert their competitor into a replacement revenue source.

It'll probably be a case of whoever has the best lawyers + contacts + persistence wins.

But it'll be interesting if discovery shows evidence they know they don't have a case and are trying it anyway. "Piercing the corporate veil" can theoretically be a consequence of that AFAIK.


That doesn’t prove their claims are valid.

I can claim the same and offer licenses per device.


How does how they bill for their product, matter in terms of if their lawsuit holds merit?

Can you point to any other patent lawsuit over AV1? AFAIK the Dolby case is the first.

It's frequently simplifying things so that you don't have to worry about managing a server at all.

I run a PowerShell script once a day at noon, and I have no idea what kind of server it's running on, where in the world that server is, how much memory it has, or any other details. I get about a CPU, a dozen MB of memory, and a tiny amount of network capacity for about 5 seconds.

This is a very different experience from "We will rent you a VPS by the month".


Certainly in the UK, we don't have the same issues with terrible Chinese fakes that I hear about from US Amazon users.

We don’t have the fakes problem but Amazon in the UK has a growing amount of stuff that is just resale of stuff from temu. I suspect if you tested the top 10 chargers on Amazon that weren’t anker, you’d find the same problems.

One of the many reasons (up to and including US foreign policy) I don't buy from Amazon any more.

I'd sooner give Argos the money, they aren't that much more expensive (if at all) for the common set of things they sell and I can walk and pick it up same day.

They broke the first rule of e-commerce - "Don't make the customer think".


I agree. They’ve also devalued prime - I used to know that prime meant next day, now it just means “free delivery” but it could be 2+ weeks depending on where it’s coming from.

argos are great. I ordered something from them for next day delivery and I had it 20 minutes later. The nearest Argos to me is about 15 minutes away so they must have been sitting waiting for orders.


One of the best usb chargers for the money is the 40W IKEA charger. I trust their quality control.

I wasn't aware that Ikea sold a charger, so I googled it - this is the very first result: https://www.ikea.com/us/en/customer-service/product-support/...

The fact they're even doing a recall tells you they care.

When people buy from Alibaba and resell it on Amazon, they're not bothering to issue recalls.


The good people at qzzdfghjww company would NEVER sell a defective product.

I don’t know about fakes, but browsing Amazon DE feels like browsing AliExpress when looking for any technology products. Especially cables, adapters and such.

Amazon UK these days is definitely full of Chinese reproductions and drop shipped knock offs.

Whether they're dangerous I don't know, I've not tried them.


Payback time in Scotland is 6-ish years. Same seems to be true in Massachusetts. Solar Panels have a lifespan of around 25 years. Inverters may need to be replaced sooner than that, but still last at least a decade.

So it pays for itself 3-4 times over.


There is no way that is true unless those solar panels are very subsidized. The energy needed to make a PV is 2x what that panel would harvest over its entire lifetime in Scotland for example. Scotland is a terrible place for PV. The numbers you give are probably accurate for central Mexico though. Also, the mean lifetime of a PV panel is 20 years.

We spend billions every year in gas subsidies. We spend billions every year in food subsidies. For energy independence and the carbon reduction alone, this is a worthwhile investment even if the upfront costs are substantial.

Your information appears to be 20 years out of date.

And even more-so, with the extra information you discover, and especially the alternate ending, your end may very-much not be justified.

Non-grey-area cases are common, and never reach court.

If a case reaches court then that means that either the evidence or the law isn't clear enough for the person to simply plead guilty (or the case to be dropped).


If you want to persuade people of your point then this kind of reply isn't going to do a good job of that.

I’m an engineer, not an influencer.

Learn the difference by dealing with substance, not personability.


You should lead with substance then. Instead you joined the discussion here with a polemic statement.

Idiotic take. Clearly you didn’t click on the link.

Besides, I updated the article for clueless people like you, so give it another shot.


Updated again, and translated to 11 languages besides English.

Peace.


The opposite of "hand egg" is not "foot egg".

And the point is that the object played in "American Football" is not a ball. Balls are round. It is egg shaped. The object played in "Football" is a ball. Describing the ball in football as an egg just makes you look like you can't see properly.


i get it, it’s not the canonical “egg shape”, but many eggs (fish/frogs/etc) are spherical.

"Foot Fish-egg" would be pretty funny, I agree.

Foot-roe, or foot-spawn for amphibians.

The USA is upset about Brazil providing Pix, their local equivalent.

https://restofworld.org/2025/pix-brazil-us-investigation-dig...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: