Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | elyobo's commentslogin

What's the effect of this? I don't really understand why they have a "recognised" list at all or what the implications are.

Various laws, regulations, and processes come with religious exceptions. In order to qualify for religious exceptions, you need to follow a qualified religion.

That does explain why Jehovah's Witnesses would be on here. They won multiple court cases to be excluded from military services.


They go on your dog tags to make sure that, if you're killed, your body is handled in a manner appropriate for your religious beliefs.

As I expected given who this is coming from, the choices are "Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, and Leftovers".


non major updates in the npm ecosystem are pretty reliable in my experience; my much more limited python experience suggests that semver is much less respected on that side of the fence


I've noticed it's better in npm than in python, but still been burned enough times


I tried it on Tuesday and, having used CC a lot lately, was shocked at how bad it was - I'd forgotten.


postgres with rls to hide soft deleted records means that most of the app code doesn't need to know or care about them, still issues reads, writes, deletes to the same source table and as far as the app knows its working


I would also say that most modern ORMs and frameworks also either come with soft delete feature (with automatic filtering on all queries) as part of the package or there are third-party libraries available for ORMs adding this functionality without the hassle of dealing with views (maybe it's me, but I've never had good experience with DB views).


Yeah, Kiwi English also, e.g. describing something as "not bad" rather than "good" is normal.

> How's things? > Not bad.


They're falling already? Excellent, I was hoping I could get to this point without ever having to figure out exactly what they were.


Do they have real beans in them?


Came to say this!



Can we have a more informative, less clickbaity, title?


What would a more informative, less clickbaity title be?

(preferably using representative language from the article)


Meta Superintelligence Labs' first paper is about RAG


Ok thanks! Belatedly updated.


there should be a guideline to get rid of clickbait titles. its an epidemic here


There is of course such a guideline: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

We don't catch every case, but if you're talking about the frontpage, I'm surprised to hear you say "epidemic". What are some recent examples?


I wouldn’t give much weight to the person that had an opinion about the guidelines without reading them :)


Acknowledging their existence in principle is already a lot!


also once everybody else is obstructing your view with a bigger car it becomes necessary to have a bigger one, it's a race to the metaphorical bototm


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: