Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | grosswait's commentslogin

? They are a Chinese company

they have office in Austin Texas, sell products and services to USA, and GitHub itself is USA service (not sure if available in China).

point: they enfrocing network access for their products (including USA), which are sensitive. so, maybe export control problems?


Orange Reddit. Unfortunately that rings a little too true these days. Hopefully a stage that reverts at some point.

Hard to verify self-employment

I don’t live in Poland, but this is like comparing a thriving metro area to Silicon Valley. Just because the metro isn’t coming up with the latest ideas doesn’t mean it doesn’t have its own economy - it’s just different. From my outsider perspective this is very much a positive step for Poland and should be celebrated.

It absolutely is Linux, and yes the JVM could absolutely run on something else. But it is Linux and you can run Linux binaries directly on it - that just isn’t how it is used by end users.

The JVM has nothing to do with Android. There is no JVM running android apps.

There was Dalvik VM at one point but now it’s just the Android Runtime.


No you cannot, the NDK has a specific set of oficial APIS, and the Android team feels in the right to kill any application that doesn't follow the law of Android land.

Some folks like the termux rebels, occasionally find out there is a sherif in town.

> As documented in the Android N behavioral changes, to protect Android users and apps from unforeseen crashes, Android N will restrict which libraries your C/C++ code can link against at runtime. As a result, if your app uses any private symbols from platform libraries, you will need to update it to either use the public NDK APIs or to include its own copy of those libraries. Some libraries are public: the NDK exposes libandroid, libc, libcamera2ndk, libdl, libGLES, libjnigraphics, liblog, libm, libmediandk, libOpenMAXAL, libOpenSLES, libstdc++, libvulkan, and libz as part of the NDK API. Other libraries are private, and Android N only allows access to them for platform HALs, system daemons, and the like. If you aren’t sure whether your app uses private libraries, you can immediately check it for warnings on the N Developer Preview.

https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2016/06/improving-...

These stable APIs,

https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/stable_apis


That's all user space platform specifics, it has no relation to your previous statement where you said 'android is not linux'.

Someone can statically build a freestanding executable/so targetting arm64 linux (specifically the right android linux kernel version) and it will run fine on Android. The syscall interface, process model, file descriptors, signals, memory mapping, all of this is Linux, this is what people mean when they say Android is just Linux.


Yes, exactly PlayStore isn't GNU/Linux, normies don't use ADB.

What's amazing about Linux is that you don't have to use the system's libc, and you don't have to use dynamic linking.

That said, newer Androids use seccomp to restrict which syscalls you can use, basically to what bionic exposes anyway. This doesn't seem to affect Termux and friends, which can apparently run full X11 applications without root.

(edit) Notably, splice() is still callable, so maybe the POC needs to be tweaked...


Yes, at which point it isn't GNU/Linux, rather something else built on top of the Linux kernel.

As for termux,

https://wiki.termux.com/wiki/Termux_Google_Play


https://www.androidpolice.com/google-support-linux-kernels-a...

Google relies on Linux LTS kernels. When the Linux LTS team dropped support from 6 years down to 2 years, Google stepped in to cover the 4-year gap.

It is Linux. It's basically a distro.


When people say Linux they mean GNU/Linux.

In common parlance, yes -- because there is no practical distinction. But in cases where something is just using the Linux kernel without GNU and other common userpand components (and there is a practical distinction) then it's definitionally untrue to say that it's "not Linux" if you really meant to say "it's not GNU/Linux".

I've always thought this was extremely interesting: https://chimera-linux.org/

That is indeed interesting!

Alpine Linux is not using GNU. I'm sure there are others. No definition you can ever come up with will have no exceptions in widespread use. Live with it.

Maybe. Depends on context, and in this case the context means, no I do not mean GNU/Linux

That's specific libraries, when using the default linker. You could construct that same behavior on desktop linux too. And you can avoid it equally well on Android - you can statically-link things just fine, you can use libraries you actually control, and presumably use a custom linker if desired. It's utterly non-surprising that "you run code you don't control" results in "said code...can do arbitrary things for unsupported use". (Never mind that, instead of a "sherif", they could've just renamed all private symbols, or just naturally replaced them over time, breaking your code all the same, just in a more confusing way)

Also some obligatory Linux vs GNU/Linux comment. (and it's not like GNU/Linux doesn't ever change under your feet - see the glibc DT_HASH debacle)


- Waydroid

- Is totally Linux


Or your model is not "woke enough"

I have very little patience for bothsidesism at this point.

Your side is not the only side.

Obviously.

"Bothsidesism" posits that the two sides are broadly similar. The last few years have debunked that concept pretty conclusively.


It also posits that there are only two sides.

In the US, that is functionally the case, and likely to remain that way.

Yes but OP made a good point (model censorship going too far in the name of "woke"ness) and you shut them down.

Yes, because it's disingenuous bullshit.

As it was with "campus protests violate free speech!" from the folks who immediately turned around and banned voluntary diversity programs at universities.

As it was with "Twitter bans violate free speech" from the folks who bought it and banned @elonjet and the word cisgender.


Are people not allowed to suggest models may be too censored? Is that idea censored?

Am I not allowed to suggest it's disingenuous bullshit to pull the "both sides" thing?

That's right. It was uncalled for. I see no evidence OP was making a bad faith argument, but you assumed that right away.

Because it's incredibly frustrating to see the government remove women and men of colour from government websites, deleting climate data, and sending out violent mobs to round people up while people sit around saying their main worry is that regulatory bodies will move to make things "too woke." There's no "woke" equivalent to the insanity being acted out by the US administration.

why? Most regulations (ADA, affirmative action, etc.) fall into the "not woke enough" category of model regulation. Current administration aside, complaints of this sort are more likely. It’s absurd, really, to believe there would be a regulation governing a model being too woke; regulation itself is woke

> Most regulations (ADA, affirmative action, etc.) fall into the "not woke enough" category of model regulation

For sake of argument, let’s assume this is true. Those rules are still structured as laws, with boundaries and legal recourse. The precedent being set, that the President gets “voluntary” deference from private companies, is un-American and will be abused by the left.


I don't think I'm smart/intellectual enough to respond to this

or i just don't understand what you're saying


The ADA isn't about wokeness. It's about being able to live in society with a disability.

Limiting a business's ability to exist because they can't afford to accommodate a small percentage of the population is 100% about wokeness

Well, we've just now defined safety rules, health codes, paying taxes, and the like as "woke".

You'd be calling the First Amendment woke if we proposed it now.


"Woke" is just a dog whistle. It's used by anti-intellectuals on the right to signal their allegiance to whatever their dear leader says, and is used to say "I am triggered by this idea" regardless of what the idea is. Anything can be woke to these people, up to and including the 2nd Amendment.

it is actually perfect, you hear or read “woke” you can immediately turn around and know the level of intelligence in front of you requires immediate extraction from any further proceedings :)

The terrifying thing is that we can't just ignore it anymore, though. These people are wielding the power of the world at a time of global crises.

it is the people that are buying the BS though… those wielding power will say whatever the F they want to rile up the people but end of the day it is the people buying this.

the outmost funny thing to me glancing at this from the sidelines (I stopped following news and am generally largely disconnected from “politics”) is that people that are buying the “woke” garbage are not realizing they voted for the most woke there is. entire current administration is DEI hires (this is literal, every single person working is DEI hire), cancel culture is raging, if they could they would cancel 50% of the population (this is especially funny to me, shows you how “small” people are), you got billions of dollars literally being stolen in broad daylight while bitching about nancy pelosi, you got two president’s sons pillaging the country while bitching about hunter’s laptop… so fascinating to watch america slowly disintegrate into what has become


Watching from the sidelines isn't disconnecting from politics, it's supporting the status quo. Please reconsider your position.

Taxes? How?

I agree with the rest, sure.

Health codes and safety rules are woke, yes. I would have thought that as given. Debates over where you draw the line are absolutely a matter of wokeness.

The way freedom of expression is regulated today is generally woke. The WPFI is insanely woke.


> Taxes? How?

They, at times, "[limit] a business's ability to exist because they can't afford to accommodate a small percentage of the population".

> Health codes and safety rules are woke, yes.

I take it you never read the parable of the boy who cried wolf.


getting the vibe that english isn't your first language, and don't feel like arguing theough a language barrier

i don't begin to understand either of these points

fwiw i'm woke, happy to be woke, encourage wokeness


> getting the vibe that english isn't your first language

Well, that's a first for me.

Alternate theory: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48023653


Every business has a threshold tax rate beyond which it ceases to be viable. Herego, for every tax rate there are businesses right below that threshold that are taxed out of existence.

> Debates over where you draw the line are absolutely a matter of wokeness.

This is offensive in how trite it is


ADA preceeded wokeness by at least 2 decades

How about NIST?

“Elon Musk's xAI, the software firm behind Gorq” - this is not an autocorrect error.

Is there a reason you felt the need to slip this non sequitur in your reply?


I am not sure, but it probably isn't because I wanted to sound smart by using smart sounding words :)


Apologies- Reason: explanation, motive, cause, or justification

Definitely


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: