Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You write this as if it summarizes the discussion, but of course the discussion we can all read here says the opposite: Google's legal concerns are probably not false, and are concerns for multiple other organizations; not only that, but Google has ample reason to be particularly concerned about these kinds of IP issues.


I think it's possible have "Google has concerns about the AGPL for itself" and "Google would like you to not use the AGPL by making you afraid of it".


The first statement is almost certainly true. The second is supposition.


Possibly, but I think it is fairly clear how it would help Google to do the second. (To be explicit: I'm not saying they are doing this. But there are others here arguing that this is just not something they could be doing, which is absurd.)


You're describing supposition. That's fine! It's fine if we just agree.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: