Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's viewed as a DRM measure. Recipes are not copyrightable unless they are attached to a story. It's probably an urban legend, but can't blame poor food bloggers from acting on it.


It's not an urban legend in the United States:

====

Based on this reasoning, the United States Copyright Office Compendium, the Office’s manual for examiners, states that a mere listing of ingredients or contents is not copyrightable, as lists are not protected by copyright law (chapter 314.4(F)). The Office has also stated that a “simple set of directions” is uncopyrightable.

In addition, courts have found that recipes are wholly factual and functional, and therefore uncopyrightable. As the Sixth Circuit described in Tomaydo-Tomahdo, LLC v. Vozary, “the list of ingredients is merely a factual statement, and as previously discussed, facts are not copyrightable. Furthermore, a recipe’s instructions, as functional directions, are statutorily excluded from copyright protection.”

https://copyrightalliance.org/are-recipes-cookbooks-protecte...


I would have thought the same reasoning would apply to software. I'm curious about how reasoning differs in that case.


I have to think part of it is also the pay structure of food bloggers being paid by the word.


I'm pretty sure recipes aren't copyrightable, even when they are attached to a story.


I'd assume it prevents legally scraping & copying the whole site, at the cost of a silly amount of human labor writing the fluff.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: