Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Abortion legalization is an offshoot of the same early 20th century progressive anti-natalism as eugenics. Planned Parenthood was, of course, founded by a eugenicist. In most of the developing world, like my home country of Bangladesh, abortion is still justified primarily to avoid poor women having too many children.

There’s other justifications for it now, of course, but I’m not drawing a novel comparison here. In those hypotheticals of “what do we do that future generations will view as evil” eating meat and elective abortions are probably near the top of the list. (In both cases, I suspect technological and economic change will make us forget why we did it in the first place.)



Nice "Genetic Fallacy".

Abortion gives women control of their body, no more reason or justification needed.

I whole-heartedly disagree with elective abortions being one of those “what do we do that future generations will view as evil” things. I think the opposite is true and that forced birth is what future generations will view as evil. Younger generations are trending pro-choice. [1]

1. https://news.gallup.com/poll/246206/abortion-trends-age.aspx


LOL abortion has been done since before homo sapiens branched off into their own species. Christians believe that their god performs millions of abortions every day (they call them miscarriages).

Abortions are in every culture on every continent.

Claiming it stems from the 20th century is insane.

You have it wrong, future humans will look back and wonder why we didn't abort more when we clearly couldn't even meet the needs of the babies we already had.


> Christians believe that their god performs millions of abortions every day (they call them miscarriages).

I’m pretty sure it’s not just Christians that distinguish between a child dying of natural causes and a deliberate killing.

> Abortions are in every culture on every continent.

Abortion restrictions also exist in a vast variety of cultures in every continent: https://vividmaps-com.cdn.ampproject.org/i/s/vividmaps.com/w.... It’s not something “Christians” came up with.


> distinguish between a child dying of natural causes and a deliberate killing.

You must have responded in the wrong thread, since this one isn't about children. Christianity is relevant where others aren't since they're the reason everyone is having this debate in the US.

And Christians don't consider "natural causes". A foetus is either delivered by the mother, aborted by the mother, or aborted by god.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: