>Do we approve of this behaviour in a normative sense?
What is the approximate amount of taxes for Mr. Thiel of which you would approve of? How much wealth should he retain?
If a single individual does not have the right to confiscate your wealth, but a collective body does, how many voters are required to confiscate your wealth?
Where exactly is this demarcation point? Is there a limbo zone where the morality of forcible confiscation begins to bend?
What is the approximate amount of taxes for Mr. Thiel of which you would approve of? How much wealth should he retain?
If a single individual does not have the right to confiscate your wealth, but a collective body does, how many voters are required to confiscate your wealth?
Where exactly is this demarcation point? Is there a limbo zone where the morality of forcible confiscation begins to bend?