Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

By global standards, the United States has hilariously low density and has hilariously high incomes, which means it's significantly more expensive to maintain a network. You're comparing a network that doesn't have 5G coverage in towns 20 miles away from the center of London [1] to one that has coverage over a gigantic proportion of the area that actually contains people at any given time. [2]

1: https://www.nperf.com/en/map/GB/-/164526.Vodafone-Mobile/sig...

2: https://www.nperf.com/en/map/US/-/85.T-Mobile-inc-Sprint/sig...



If you exclude legacy CDMA sites, the US and UK have basically the same number of cell sites per capita.

https://opencellid.org/stats.php


Is cell sites per capita a relevant measure?


"Please note that Logical network numbers are only loosely correlated with physical infrastructure like cell towers."




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: