I mean there are several reasons why this is not argument for communism:
1. Here communism means handling it all yourself and capitalism means leaving some part of the economy to AI. It's immediately obvious why one will prevail since we dont have AGI yet. Also the game provides million times more information than Project Cybersyn ever hoped it'd have.
2. The dev have been accused to be very biased for communism. For the first few patches they don't even allow capitalists to set up their own investment ffs, only able to invest money to "investment pool" that will be used by government (player). Apart from design choices, they are also ones responsible for AI. They can set up landlords to be super selfish and revolutionaries to be super selfless and vice versa.
3. One of the most notable thing is that in the previous game, Victoria 2, it's not this lopsided. Even when that game is as robust of a simulation or even more so.
1. Here communism means handling it all yourself and capitalism means leaving some part of the economy to AI. It's immediately obvious why one will prevail since we dont have AGI yet. Also the game provides million times more information than Project Cybersyn ever hoped it'd have.
2. The dev have been accused to be very biased for communism. For the first few patches they don't even allow capitalists to set up their own investment ffs, only able to invest money to "investment pool" that will be used by government (player). Apart from design choices, they are also ones responsible for AI. They can set up landlords to be super selfish and revolutionaries to be super selfless and vice versa.
3. One of the most notable thing is that in the previous game, Victoria 2, it's not this lopsided. Even when that game is as robust of a simulation or even more so.