>Because there is absolutely zero evidence that there are drugs being physically trafficked at Meta's offices?
Well that's not why they would raid Meta. They would raid them to preserve evidence and documents of Meta's complicity with the drug trafficking that does occur on their platforms.
They can do that with a court order. Meta would end up caught with their pants down if they deleted evidence. There's little to no chance that they could do that without either leaving behind damning evidence, or having an employee blow the whistle.
Yes, they can do that with a court order. Was that in question? As to whether or not they could get away with it, I don't agree. Depends what you mean by get away with it. They'd probably rather take a default on the issue than release any internal discussions making them look complicit.
Well that's not why they would raid Meta. They would raid them to preserve evidence and documents of Meta's complicity with the drug trafficking that does occur on their platforms.