I couldn't find a source that he said that. Wikipedia says it's not sourced, just a variant of:
> [I do not] carry such information in my mind since it is readily available in books. ...The value of a college education is not the learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think.
I haven't got the book yet but I'm planning to get it soon. As written in Q&A - The techniques I learned, and used in the memory contest, are great for remembering structured information - this might be great for learning languages. I remember grabbing a lot of new vocabulary by studying by heart lyrics of songs, quotes, jokes or whole sequences of dialogs from movies.
Just a head's up, this books reads more like a novel than a How-To. There are other books that are better for actually learning the memory techniques discussed in _Moonwalking_.
I don't mean to imply that _Moonwalking_ isn't worth buying; I think it's a really good book and was a very fun read, but at the same time, it was FAR less instructional than I had expected (though I did learn while reading it).
This is presumably based on the theory that your mind has a certain amount of "free space" and that you don't want to fill that space up with a bunch of trivia. Anyone know whether cognitive science supports this theory? Bonus points for references.