You originally made the statement that "Hegel is irrelevant in the age of measurement", to which I objected. Unless you're going to back pedal further, you did find studying Hegel questionable.
I'm not going to go on the attack, but your pronouncements and self-certainty do not sound well considered.
There are structural limits to the Hegelian Dialectic being used as a universal epistemology
Marxism and other non-numerically based epistemology traditions refuse to accept this
The majority of people aren’t even as deep as hegel and yet even the hegelians still think they have a universal epistemology
when they have a keplerian version at best that hasn’t even heard of subatomic particles