Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Nothing about the US Department of War's actions over the last 2 years, whose contracts Sam eagerly pursued to weaponize AI, has had to do with "preventing being subjugated". What they did do was bomb 150 or so private individual school girls.

You're saying the above is bait, when your own comment is nothing but it.

 help



>Nothing about the US Department of War's actions over the last 2 years

Questionable and violent US foreign policy is much much older than the current Trump administration.


Pasting the same reply as you sibling comment:

My comment here is about the ethics of military weapons vs assassinations of private individuals. I have no idea what you’re talking about.


Then your comment is completely irrelevant to the conversation as a reply to

> Sam eagerly pursued DoD contracts to weaponize AI. And then lobbied for legislation to ensure OpenAI cannot be held accountable if people are killed due to their systems.".

Your comment can't both A. be relevant as a reply to the above B. yet have "no idea what I'm talking about", as if it is not relevant. Either both of us are saying something relevant, or neither of us are. You can't have your cake and eat it too.


Look at the parent of the comment you are quoting.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: