Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How does Chocolatey cope with install options? The author's example script names a lot of programs to install but no further options for them.

If I install a bunch of programs with Chocolatey, will I end up with ten yahoo toolbars and a trial version of every antivirus product, because the bundled crapware for each app is installed by default?



It all depends on the package maintainer(s).

If you're not happy with exactly what they've provided, it gets a little more complicated; you'll need to edit the packages (written in Powershell) themselves.

Scott Hanselman has a nice write-up/example here: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/IsTheWindowsUserReadyForAptget...

I really like the idea behind Chocolatey, but in the end the time that I spent fiddling with packages minimized any potential time savings.

However, if you're not picky about your software, just need a quick copy of something, or only want to test something out, I'd definitely recommend giving it a try.


I've never had adware/toolbars or such installed by chocolatey, can't speak for others though. I use when I want a quick way of getting for example the JRE without crap installed.


You shouldn't be installing what is essentially scamware anyways.


Even JDK comes with some. I find the situation pretty hopeless.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: