Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'm just pointing out that this thread is definitely not supposed to be on HN, as is defined by the rules of the website.

The applicable "rules" (actually, they are labeled "guidelines" [0] for good reason) can be viewed as either supporting or opposing it.

Specifically, one could view it as on-topic as falling within "anything that good hackers would find interesting." (Section 215 surveillance clearly has a special interest within the "hacker" culture, which is more plugged into it than the general population), or as probably off-topic because "If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic."

> I'm not positing an opinion, I'm arguing for a fact.

You are positing your interpretation of the application of rules which are fuzzy and inherently subjective as "fact", and where the only things in the rules that would support your conclusion are hedged with "most" or "probably". Your suggestion that the HN guidelines can reasonably be read in a way in which the topic here would be unequivocally, factually off-topic is an untenable argument.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html -- under "What to Submit".



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: